Personal colour analysis has the strange property of being almost unknown by name in one country and a household concept in another. In Italy it is called armocromia and was the most-Googled beauty term of 2023. In South Korea it is called personal color and is a routine appointment for anyone who takes their appearance seriously. In Germany it is Farbberatung; in France colorimétrie; in Spain colorimetría personal. The American spelling drops the British u: color analysis.
The names move. The practice does not. In every one of those countries, a trained practitioner sits a client in neutral daylight, holds fabric drapes against the face, and reads the response in the skin. The method is identical. Only the cultural moment around it changes — and at the moment, the cultural moment is large.
One practice, many names
The English vocabulary alone is wide. Personal colour analysis, seasonal colour analysis, 12-season colour analysis, colour consultation, image colour consultation, tonal colour analysis, wardrobe colour analysis — all describe the same diagnostic discipline, with practitioners variously emphasising the seasons framework, the underlying axes (undertone, value, chroma), or the practical wardrobe outcome.
The British–American split is the smallest of the differences. American practitioners spell it color analysis and, more often than not, work in the four- or twelve-season system descended from Carole Jackson's Color Me Beautiful. British practitioners use the same systems, with the same draping work, and spell it colour.
The deeper splits are between national traditions — and the deepest of those, today, is Italian.
Italy: armocromia
Italy has had a fully-formed mainstream wave. The architect of it is Rossella Migliaccio, a Roman image consultant who founded the Italian Image Institute and published Armocromia in 2020 — a long, careful book that translated the established colour-analysis literature into a contemporary Italian register and gave the practice a name memorable enough to spread.
Spread it did. By 2022 the term was on Italian morning television and the subject of viral TikTok videos; by 2023 Italian search interest in armocromia outstripped almost every other beauty term. Migliaccio's Roman institute now has waiting lists measured in months. Italian celebrities have been openly analysed — Chiara Ferragni, Diletta Leotta, Bianca Atzei and Aurora Ramazzotti have all discussed their seasons publicly — and a generation of Italian practitioners has trained in her method.
The Italian system uses the same twelve sub-seasons as the rest of the trade, translated directly: primavera chiara, estate soft, autunno deep, inverno bright. The seasonal categories are identical. The difference, in Italy, is that everyone has heard of them.
South Korea and Japan: personal color
The other contemporary capital of personal colour analysis is Seoul. Korean salons offer personal color diagnosis as a paid one- to two-hour service, often integrated with skincare and makeup consultations, and routine enough that university students book sessions before job interviews. The cultural pressure to present a coherent appearance is high; the cost is modest by Western standards (typically ₩100,000–200,000, around £60–120); and Korean celebrities openly discuss their results.
Jennie of Blackpink is widely cited as a Bright Winter; Jisoo as a True Winter; IU as a Light Spring; Suzy as a Spring Light; the actress Park Min-young is publicly a Soft Summer. The labels appear in beauty magazines and in product marketing — Korean cosmetic brands now release lipstick lines tagged by personal-color season. Japan runs in parallel under パーソナルカラー, with a slightly older industry built around 16- and 4-season systems and a strong tradition of seasonal-typing manuals in print.
The Korean and Japanese services are technically the same — drapes, daylight, three axes — but they sit inside a beauty culture that treats the result as a piece of practical infrastructure rather than a personal indulgence. That is the cultural difference. The diagnostic content is the same.
Continental Europe
Germany has the oldest formalised industry in continental Europe. The term is Farbberatung — literally colour advice — and the trade is professionalised through long-standing institutes such as the Farb- und Stilberatung network. The adjacent term Farbanalyse is used for the diagnostic component specifically. Typberatung is broader and covers style and silhouette work as well as colour.
France calls it colorimétrie, often as part of broader conseil en image services; Spain calls it colorimetría personal or análisis de color. Portugal, the Netherlands and the Nordic countries each have their own translations and small but mature professional bodies. Russia and the wider CIS have a substantial industry in цветотипирование (colour-typing), with a particular regional emphasis on the Tonal and 16-season systems.
The method, in every one of these traditions, is the same draping work in neutral light. The vocabulary changes; the practice does not.
A short history
The intellectual lineage is older than the seasonal vocabulary suggests. Johannes Itten, a teacher at the Bauhaus, published The Art of Color in 1961 and proposed that students fell into recognisable seasonal types whose own colouring harmonised with particular palettes. The book is the conceptual root that every modern system traces back to.
Suzanne Caygill, a San Francisco couturier, developed Itten's observation into the first formalised personal-colour practice during the 1940s through the 1980s, training a generation of analysts in a four-season framework. Bernice Kentner formalised parts of the method into a teachable curriculum in the 1970s.
The popular breakthrough was Carole Jackson's Color Me Beautiful in 1980 — a paperback that sold something close to fifteen million copies and put the four-season system into kitchens across the English-speaking world. The book is dated now in its photography, but its underlying premise is intact, and almost every practising analyst working today either trained in its lineage or in a system that descends from it.
The twelve-season refinement is a development of the 1990s and 2000s, attributed in various places to Kathryn Kalisz (the Sci\ART system) and to a constellation of European and American analysts working in parallel. It is now the standard of the trade. The 16-season system is a Japanese-led further refinement; the Tonal system favoured in some British studios reorganises the same axes around dominant characteristics rather than seasonal labels. The vocabularies branch. The underlying axes — undertone, value, chroma — do not.
Who has had it done
The historical client list is long. Carole Jackson analysed Joan Lunden, Marie Osmond and members of the Reagan-era White House social circle in the years following Color Me Beautiful's publication; the book's author tour effectively introduced colour analysis to American daytime television. David Zyla, a New York-based celebrity colour analyst and author of Color Your Style, has analysed clients including Sarah Jessica Parker and members of the Broadway community.
In Italy, Rossella Migliaccio's institute has analysed Chiara Ferragni, Aurora Ramazzotti, Diletta Leotta and a roster of RAI presenters; the resulting interviews have done as much as the book to mainstream the practice. Italian football commentators and politicians have followed.
Korean idols have been the loudest contemporary advocates. Jennie, Jisoo and Rosé of Blackpink, IU, Suzy, Park Min-young, Han So-hee and Cha Eun-woo have all been associated publicly with their personal-color results — often by their own stylists, occasionally on variety shows in real time. The K-pop visual director culture treats personal-color matching as standard production design.
In the UK the practice has remained quieter. Trinny Woodall has spoken about colour-led dressing; the late Queen's coordinator Angela Kelly worked in effectively the same discipline under a different name; and Susannah Constantine has discussed her own analysis on record. The British vocabulary is less developed than the Italian, which makes the practice harder to talk about, which makes it less visible. That is changing.
What it means in London
Whatever you call it — colour analysis, armocromia, personal color, Farbberatung, colorimétrie — the work that produces an accurate result is the same. A trained practitioner, a full set of professional drapes, north-facing daylight, two and a half hours, and the three axes of undertone, value and chroma worked through in turn.
The Colour Doc is one of a small number of London studios working in the full 12-season system in person, by appointment. Italian and Korean expats in London who ask for armocromia or personal color by name are asking for exactly what the studio offers, in English, on Chatham Road in Battersea. The vocabulary travels. The method, at least so far, requires you to be in the room.
Rebecca Sells is a certified colour practitioner and the founder of The Colour Doc, a personal colour analysis studio in Battersea, South London. She practised as a clinical medical doctor before opening the studio in 2025.
→ Book a consultation What happens in an appointment Back to the journal